Introduction
Soil infiltration is a critical process in the hydrological cycle, playing a pivotal role in flood and drought management, irrigation system design, and groundwater recharge assessment (Kim et al., 2021). Accurate estimation of infiltration rates is essential for developing effective hydrological models, which can be achieved through the application of both physics-based and empirical equations (Kim et al., 2021).
Importance of infiltration in hydrological processes
Infiltration plays a crucial role in determining the distribution of water within the soil profile, affecting various hydrological processes such as surface runoff, groundwater recharge, and soil moisture dynamics (Tian et al., 2022). The accurate estimation of infiltration rates is particularly important in the design and management of irrigation systems, where understanding soil water movement is essential for optimizing water use efficiency and crop productivity (Goyal et al., 2017).
Brief history of infiltration modeling
The study of infiltration modeling has evolved significantly since its inception in the early 20th century, with notable contributions from researchers such as Horton, Green and Ampt, and Philip (Hidayat et al., 2023). These pioneering works laid the foundation for the development of both empirical and physically-based infiltration models, which have been continuously refined to improve their accuracy and applicability across diverse soil types and environmental conditions (Ikeda et al., 2019).
Fundamentals of Infiltration
Infiltration is governed by complex interactions between soil properties, surface conditions, and hydrological processes. The rate at which water enters the soil surface and moves through the soil profile is influenced by factors such as soil texture, structure, antecedent moisture content, and surface characteristics (Ikeda et al., 2019). Understanding these factors is crucial for developing accurate infiltration models that can be applied across diverse environmental conditions.
Definition and basic concepts
Infiltration is defined as the process by which water on the ground surface enters the soil, driven primarily by gravity and capillary forces (Dragonetti et al., 2022). The rate of infiltration is influenced by various factors, including soil texture, structure, antecedent moisture content, and surface conditions, which collectively determine the soil's hydraulic properties and its capacity to absorb and transmit water (Faridah et al., 2023).
Factors affecting infiltration rates
Several key factors influence infiltration rates, including soil texture, structure, initial moisture content, and surface conditions. The interplay between these factors determines the soil's capacity to absorb and transmit water, with coarse-textured soils generally exhibiting higher infiltration rates compared to fine-textured soils (Zema et al., 2022). Additionally, land use practices and vegetation cover can significantly impact infiltration by altering soil structure and organic matter content, thus affecting the soil's hydraulic properties (Megahed et al., 2023).
Soil properties
Soil properties, such as texture, structure, and organic matter content, significantly influence the infiltration rate and capacity of a given soil (DonnyHARISUSENO & Cahya, 2023). These properties determine the soil's ability to absorb and retain water, which in turn affects the overall hydrological behavior of the landscape (Dragonetti et al., 2022).
Initial soil moisture content
The initial soil moisture content plays a crucial role in determining the infiltration rate, as it affects the soil's hydraulic conductivity and matric potential (Dai et al., 2022). Studies have shown that soil moisture content exhibits significant temporal variations, particularly in the surface and middle soil layers, which are more responsive to precipitation patterns (Dai et al., 2022).
Land cover and vegetation
Land cover and vegetation significantly influence infiltration rates by altering soil structure, organic matter content, and surface characteristics. Studies have shown that woodland planting can reduce peak flow intensity compared to impermeable land cover, with varying effects depending on storm duration and season (Revell et al., 2021). However, the relationship between land cover and erosion is complex, as areas with dense vegetation on high slopes may still experience elevated soil erosion rates due to the dominance of the slope factor (Hellens et al., 2024).
Rainfall intensity and duration
Rainfall intensity and duration significantly influence infiltration rates, with higher intensities often leading to reduced infiltration due to surface sealing and increased runoff (Zhang et al., 2019). The relationship between rainfall characteristics and infiltration is further complicated by factors such as soil type, antecedent moisture conditions, and land cover, necessitating the use of sophisticated models to accurately predict infiltration behavior under varying rainfall scenarios (Haruna et al., 2023).
Overview of Empirical Infiltration Models
Empirical infiltration models have been widely used in hydrological studies due to their simplicity and ease of application. These models, such as the Kostiakov, Horton, and Philip equations, provide mathematical representations of the infiltration process based on observed data and experimental results (Faridah et al., 2023). While empirical models may lack the physical basis of more complex equations, they often offer practical solutions for estimating infiltration rates in various soil types and environmental conditions (Kim et al., 2021).
Classification of infiltration models
Infiltration models can be broadly classified into two main categories: physically-based models and empirical models (Kim et al., 2021). Physically-based models, such as the Green-Ampt equation, are derived from fundamental principles of soil physics and fluid mechanics, while empirical models, like the Kostiakov and Horton equations, are based on observed relationships between infiltration rates and time (Ikeda et al., 2019).
Advantages and limitations of empirical models
Empirical models offer several advantages, including simplicity, ease of use, and reduced data requirements compared to physically-based models (Kim et al., 2021). However, they are limited by their site-specific nature and potential lack of applicability across diverse soil types and environmental conditions, necessitating careful validation and calibration for accurate predictions (Ma et al., 2016).
Commonly Used Empirical Equations
Among the commonly used empirical equations for infiltration modeling, the Kostiakov, Horton, and Philip equations stand out for their widespread application and relative simplicity (Faridah et al., 2023). These models provide mathematical representations of the infiltration process based on observed data, offering practical solutions for estimating infiltration rates across various soil types and environmental conditions (Kim et al., 2021).
Horton's Equation
Horton's equation, developed by Robert E. Horton in 1939, describes the infiltration capacity as an exponential decay function of time (Faridah et al., 2023). This model has been widely applied in various soil types and environmental conditions, demonstrating its versatility in predicting infiltration rates across different landscapes (Florentino et al., 2023).
Formula and parameters
Horton's equation is widely used in hydrological modeling due to its simplicity and effectiveness in describing the infiltration process. The formula is expressed as:
f(t) = fc + (f0 - fc)e-kt
where f(t) is the infiltration rate at time t, fc is the final constant infiltration rate, f0 is the initial infiltration rate, and k is the decay constant (Kim et al., 2021).
Applications and limitations
Horton's equation has been widely applied in various hydrological studies, particularly for estimating infiltration rates in urban and agricultural settings (Kim et al., 2021). However, its limitations include the assumption of constant rainfall intensity and the need for empirical determination of parameters, which may not accurately represent complex field conditions (Sage et al., 2020).
Green-Ampt Model
The Green-Ampt model, developed by Green and Ampt in 1911, is a physically-based infiltration equation that has been widely applied in hydrological studies (Kim et al., 2021). This model simulates the advancing front in border irrigation by coupling the one-dimensional equations of Barré de Saint-Venant for surface flow with the Green-Ampt equation for subsurface flow in porous media (Fuentes et al., 2022).
Theoretical background
The Green-Ampt model assumes a sharp wetting front and uniform initial water content, which simplifies the complex nature of soil water movement (Kim et al., 2021). This simplification allows for practical application in various hydrological studies, particularly in scenarios where detailed soil data may be limited (Ma et al., 2016).
Equation and key variables
The Green-Ampt equation is expressed as:
f = Ks(1 + (ψfΔθ) / F)
where f is the infiltration rate, Ks is the saturated hydraulic conductivity, ψf is the wetting front soil suction head, Δθ is the change in soil moisture content, and F is the cumulative infiltration . This model has been widely applied in various hydrological studies, particularly for estimating infiltration rates in agricultural settings and urban stormwater management (Tian et al., 2022).
Strengths and weaknesses
The Green-Ampt model offers several strengths, including its physical basis and ability to incorporate soil hydraulic properties directly into the infiltration calculations (Kim et al., 2021). However, it may oversimplify complex field conditions, particularly in heterogeneous soils or under variable rainfall intensities (Zhang et al., 2019).
Philip's Two-Term Model
Philip's Two-Term Model, developed by John Philip in 1957, provides a simplified approach to describing the infiltration process based on soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity (Faridah et al., 2023). This model has been widely applied in various hydrological studies due to its ability to capture the essential features of infiltration while maintaining computational simplicity (Abdel-Sattar et al., 2023).
Equation derivation
Philip's Two-Term Model is derived from the Richards equation, which describes water movement in unsaturated soils (Tian et al., 2022). This model expresses the cumulative infiltration as a function of time, incorporating both sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity parameters to account for capillary and gravitational forces (Hernández-Atencia et al., 2023).
Practical applications
Philip's Two-Term Model has been successfully applied in various hydrological studies, particularly for estimating infiltration rates in agricultural settings and urban stormwater management . The model's ability to capture both short-term and long-term infiltration behavior makes it particularly useful for simulating water movement in heterogeneous soils and under variable rainfall conditions (Kim et al., 2021).
Kostiakov Equation
The Kostiakov equation, developed by A.N. Kostiakov in 1932, is another widely used empirical model for describing soil infiltration rates . This model expresses the infiltration rate as a power function of time, making it particularly useful for describing infiltration in medium to fine-textured soils (Gebul, 2022).
Model description and parameters
The Kostiakov equation expresses the infiltration rate as a power function of time, represented as I = atb, where I is the cumulative infiltration, t is time, and a and b are empirical constants (Abdel-Sattar et al., 2023). This model has demonstrated good performance in predicting cumulative water infiltration depth, with an average coefficient of determination of 0.939 in clay soils under various tillage practices (Abdel-Sattar et al., 2023).
Modified Kostiakov equation
The Modified Kostiakov equation incorporates an additional term to account for the final steady-state infiltration rate, addressing a limitation of the original model (Abdel-Sattar et al., 2023). This modification improves the equation's applicability in scenarios with prolonged irrigation or rainfall events, where the infiltration rate approaches a constant value over time (Gebul, 2022).
SCS Curve Number Method
The SCS Curve Number method, developed by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service, is a widely used approach for estimating direct runoff from rainfall events in small to medium-sized watersheds (Wang & Chu, 2023). This empirical model relates runoff depth to rainfall depth, taking into account soil type, land use, and antecedent moisture conditions (Basediya et al., 2023).
Concept and methodology
The SCS Curve Number method utilizes a dimensionless curve number (CN) to represent the combined hydrologic effect of soil type, land use, and antecedent moisture conditions on runoff generation . This approach has been widely adopted in hydrological modeling due to its simplicity and effectiveness in estimating direct runoff from rainfall events, particularly in small to medium-sized watersheds .
Limitations and adaptations
The SCS Curve Number method has been widely adopted in hydrological modeling due to its simplicity and effectiveness in estimating direct runoff from rainfall events, particularly in small to medium-sized watersheds . However, recent studies have highlighted the need for modifications to improve its performance under varying soil moisture conditions and in urbanized areas .
Comparative Analysis of Empirical Models
This comparative analysis aims to evaluate the performance of various empirical infiltration models across different soil types and environmental conditions. A study by Abdel-Sattar et al. (2023) found that the Kostiakov equation demonstrated good performance in predicting cumulative water infiltration depth in clay soils under various tillage practices, with an average coefficient of determination of 0.939 . Additionally, recent research has highlighted the need for modifications to the SCS Curve Number method to improve its performance under varying soil moisture conditions and in urbanized areas .
Performance in different soil types
The performance of empirical infiltration models varies significantly across different soil types, with each model demonstrating strengths and limitations in specific conditions. A study by Abdel-Sattar et al. (2023) found that the Kostiakov equation performed well in predicting cumulative water infiltration depth in clay soils under various tillage practices, achieving an average coefficient of determination of 0.939 (Abdel-Sattar et al., 2023). Additionally, research by DonnyHARISUSENO & Cahya (2023) demonstrated that soil porosity and sand content exhibited positive correlations with infiltration rates, while silt, clay, water content, and degree of saturation showed negative correlations (DonnyHARISUSENO & Cahya, 2023).
Accuracy in various climatic conditions
The performance of empirical infiltration models across different climatic conditions is influenced by factors such as rainfall intensity, temperature, and evapotranspiration rates. A study by Kim et al. (2021) demonstrated that the Green-Ampt model outperformed other empirical equations in arid and semi-arid regions, while the Horton equation showed better accuracy in humid climates . Additionally, research by Tian et al. (2022) revealed that incorporating seasonal variations in soil moisture dynamics can significantly improve the predictive capabilities of empirical infiltration models across diverse climatic zones .
Ease of use and data requirements
The ease of use and data requirements for empirical infiltration models vary significantly, with simpler models like the Kostiakov equation requiring fewer input parameters compared to more complex models such as the Green-Ampt equation (Kim et al., 2021). However, the increased complexity of models like Green-Ampt often translates to improved accuracy and applicability across diverse soil types and environmental conditions, particularly in scenarios with variable initial moisture content (Fuentes, Fuentes, et al., 2022).
Recent Advances and Future Directions
Recent advances in infiltration modeling have focused on incorporating the effects of soil moisture dynamics and land cover changes into empirical equations. For instance, Wang & Chu (2023) developed a modified SCS Curve Number method that accounts for varying antecedent moisture conditions in urbanized watersheds, improving runoff predictions in small to medium-sized catchments . Additionally, remote sensing techniques have been increasingly utilized to estimate evapotranspiration rates and soil moisture content, enhancing the accuracy of infiltration models across diverse landscapes (Goyal et al., 2017).
Integration with GIS and remote sensing
Recent advancements in remote sensing technologies have significantly enhanced the integration of GIS and infiltration modeling. For instance, the use of P-band SAR polarimetry combined with soil hydrological modeling has shown promising results in estimating vertically continuous soil moisture profiles (Fluhrer et al., 2023). This approach allows for more accurate representation of spatial variability in soil properties and moisture content, thereby improving the performance of infiltration models across diverse landscapes.
Machine learning approaches in infiltration modeling
Recent advancements in machine learning techniques have shown promising results in improving the accuracy of infiltration modeling. For instance, Random Forest models incorporating net radiation, leaf area index, and surface temperature as predictor variables have demonstrated superior performance in estimating ground heat flux compared to traditional empirical equations (Bonsoms & Boulet, 2022). Additionally, hybrid models combining multiple machine learning algorithms, such as Random Forest and Support Vector Regression, have achieved high accuracy in predicting saturated hydraulic conductivity, with R2 values up to 0.829 (Granata et al., 2022).
Challenges in model selection and parameter estimation
Recent studies have highlighted the importance of considering soil heterogeneity and spatial variability in parameter estimation for infiltration models (Abdel-Sattar et al., 2023). Additionally, the integration of remote sensing techniques with machine learning approaches has shown promising results in improving the accuracy of infiltration predictions across diverse landscapes (García et al., 2020).
Conclusion
This comprehensive analysis of empirical infiltration models underscores the importance of considering soil heterogeneity and spatial variability in parameter estimation for accurate predictions . Recent advancements in remote sensing technologies, particularly the integration of P-band SAR polarimetry with soil hydrological modeling, have shown promising results in estimating vertically continuous soil moisture profiles, thereby enhancing the performance of infiltration models across diverse landscapes .
Summary of key findings
The comprehensive analysis of empirical infiltration models highlights the importance of considering soil heterogeneity and spatial variability in parameter estimation for accurate predictions. Recent advancements in remote sensing technologies, particularly the integration of P-band SAR polarimetry with soil hydrological modeling, have demonstrated promising results in estimating vertically continuous soil moisture profiles, thereby enhancing the performance of infiltration models across diverse landscapes . Furthermore, machine learning approaches, such as Random Forest models incorporating net radiation, leaf area index, and surface temperature as predictor variables, have shown superior performance in estimating ground heat flux compared to traditional empirical equations .
Recommendations for model selection in different scenarios
When selecting an appropriate infiltration model for a given scenario, it is crucial to consider factors such as soil heterogeneity, spatial variability, and the availability of input data (Hernández-Atencia et al., 2023). For instance, in watersheds with complex land use patterns and varying soil types, models that incorporate detailed soil characteristics and antecedent moisture conditions, such as the modified SCS Curve Number method, may provide more accurate runoff predictions .
Future research needs in infiltration modeling
Future research in infiltration modeling should focus on developing more robust and adaptable models that can account for the complex interactions between soil properties, land use changes, and climate variability. One promising avenue is the integration of machine learning techniques with traditional physically-based models to improve prediction accuracy and computational efficiency (Kim et al., 2021). Additionally, there is a need for more comprehensive field studies to validate and refine existing models across diverse ecosystems and soil types, particularly in regions experiencing rapid land use changes and climate shifts (Faridah et al., 2023).
References
Kim, S., Karahan, G., Sharma, M., & Pachepsky, Y. (2021). Estimating parameters of empirical infiltration models from the global dataset using machine learning. International Agrophysics, 35, 73–81.
DonnyHARISUSENO, ., & Cahya, E. N. (2023). Determination of soil infiltration rate equation based on soil properties using multiple linear regression. Journal of Water and Land Development.
Dragonetti, G., Farzamian, M., Coppola, A., Basile, A., & Santos, F. M. M. (2022). In-situ estimation of soil hydraulic and hydrodispersive properties by inversion of Electromagnetic Induction measurements and soil hydrological modeling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.
Sage, J., Berthier, E., & Gromaire, M. (2020). Modeling Soil Moisture Redistribution and Infiltration Dynamics in Urban Drainage Systems. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering.
Tian, Y., Yang, Y., Bao, Z., Song, X., Wang, G., Liu, C., Wu, H., & Mo, Y. (2022). An Analysis of the Impact of Groundwater Overdraft on Runoff Generation in the North China Plain with a Hydrological Modeling Framework. Water.
Hernández-Atencia, Y., Peña, L. E., Muñoz-Ramos, J., Rojas, I., & Álvarez, A. (2023). Use of Soil Infiltration Capacity and Stream Flow Velocity to Estimate Physical Flood Vulnerability under Land-Use Change Scenarios. Water.
Goyal, M., Panigrahi, B., & Panda, S. (2017). Micro Irrigation Scheduling and Practices.
Hidayat, D. P., Darsono, S. L. W., & Farid, M. (2023). Evaluation of Infiltration Modeling in the Cisadane Watershed in Indonesia: Existing and New Approach Equation. Water.
Ikeda, H., Wakamatsu, T., Nakaya, K., & Ishii, T. (2019). Modeling of Precipitation–Infiltration Rate using Non-Steady Surface Runoff Model (EUROSEM). JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES.
Faridah, S. N., Achmad, M., Jamaluddin, T. A. A., & Jusmira, J. (2023). Infiltration Model of Mediterranean Soil with Clay Texture. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung (Journal of Agricultural Engineering).
Zema, D., Carrà, B., & Lucas‐Borja, M. (2022). Exploring and Modeling the Short-Term Influence of Soil Properties and Covers on Hydrology of Mediterranean Forests after Prescribed Fire and Mulching. Hydrology.
Megahed, H., Farrag, A., Mohamed, A. A., D’Antonio, P., Scopa, A., & AbdelRahman, M. A. E. (2023). Groundwater Recharge Potentiality Mapping in Wadi Qena, Eastern Desert Basins of Egypt for Sustainable Agriculture Base Using Geomatics Approaches. Hydrology.
Dai, L., Fu, R., Guo, X., Du, Y., wei Fa-Zhang, & Cao, G. (2022). Soil Moisture Variations in Response to Precipitation Across Different Vegetation Types on the Northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13.
Revell, N., Lashford, C., Blackett, M., & Rubinato, M. (2021). Modelling the Hydrological Effects of Woodland Planting on Infiltration and Peak Discharge Using HEC-HMS. Water.
Hellens, O., Masika, D., & Long’ora, A. (2024). The Effect of Land Cover Change on Soil Erosion in Awach Kibuon Sub-basin, Kenya. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management.
Zhang, K., Song, B., & Zhu, D. (2019). The Influence of Sinusoidal Oscillating Water Flow on Sprinkler and Impact Kinetic Energy Intensities of Laterally-Moving Sprinkler Irrigation Systems. Water.
Haruna, A., Blanchet, J., & Favre, A. (2023). Modeling Intensity‐Duration‐Frequency Curves for the Whole Range of Non‐Zero Precipitation: A Comparison of Models. Water Resources Research, 59.
Ma, W., Zhang, X., Zhen, Q., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Effect of soil texture on water infiltration in semiarid reclaimed land. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 51, 33–41.
Florentino, R. W., Coelho, G. R. T., Zilch, M. H., Martins, K. G., Kummer, A., & Veiga, T. B. (2023). Assessing Horton and Kostiakov models focused on estimating soil water infiltration. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Tecnologia e Inovação.
Fuentes, S., Fuentes, C., Saucedo, H., & Chávez, C. (2022). Border Irrigation Modeling with the Barré de Saint-Venant and Green and Ampt Equations. Mathematics.
Abdel-Sattar, M., Al-Obeed, R., Al-hamed, S., & Aboukarima, A. (2023). Experimental and Modeling Evaluation of Impacts of Different Tillage Practices on Fitting Parameters of Kostiakov’s Cumulative Infiltration Empirical Equation. Water.
Gebul, M. A. (2022). Simplified approach for determination of parameters for Kostiakov’s infiltration equation. Water Practice and Technology.
Wang, N., & Chu, X. (2023). A Modified SCS Curve Number Method for Temporally Varying Rainfall Excess Simulation. Water.
Basediya, S. S., Tripathi, M., & Pathak, R. (2023). Estimation of Runoff Using USDA SCS-Curve Number and Autoregressive Time Series Model Parameters for Kachhinda Watershed, Morena District, Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change.
Fuentes, S., Chávez, C., Brambila-Paz, F., & Trejo-Alonso, J. (2022). Hydrodynamic Border Irrigation Model: Comparison of Infiltration Equations. Water.
Fluhrer, A., Jagdhuber, T., Montzka, C., Schumacher, M., Alemohammad, H., Tabatabaeenejad, A., Kunstmann, H., & Entekhabi, D. (2023). Estimating Soil Moisture Profiles by Combining P-Band SAR with Hydrological Modeling. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2846–2849.
Bonsoms, J., & Boulet, G. (2022). Ensemble Machine Learning Outperforms Empirical Equations for the Ground Heat Flux Estimation with Remote Sensing Data. Remote Sensing, 14, 1788.
Granata, F., Nunno, F. D., & Modoni, G. (2022). Hybrid Machine Learning Models for Soil Saturated Conductivity Prediction. Water.
García, L., Parra, L., Jiménez, J. M., Lloret, J., & Lorenz, P. (2020). IoT-Based Smart Irrigation Systems: An Overview on the Recent Trends on Sensors and IoT Systems for Irrigation in Precision Agriculture. Italian National Conference on Sensors, 20.