Introduction
Supervised Agricultural Experiences (SAEs) are integral components of agricultural education programs, providing students with hands-on learning opportunities and practical skills development. These experiences encompass a wide range of activities, from entrepreneurship ventures to placement-based internships, allowing students to apply classroom knowledge in real-world settings (Bastian et al., 2020). Financial management is a critical aspect of SAEs, as students must navigate the complexities of budgeting, record-keeping, and financial decision-making to ensure the success of their projects.
Understanding Supervised Agricultural Experiences (SAEs)
SAEs encompass a diverse range of activities, including entrepreneurship, research, and placement experiences, each presenting unique financial management challenges for students (Barrick et al., 2011). Effective financial management in SAEs requires students to develop skills in budgeting, record-keeping, and financial decision-making, which are essential for both the success of their projects and their future careers in agriculture (Haddad & Marx, 2018).
The importance of financial management in placement SAEs
Placement SAEs offer unique financial management challenges, as students must navigate the complexities of budgeting within an established business or organization. These experiences require students to develop skills in financial record-keeping, cost analysis, and resource allocation, which are essential for success in agricultural careers (Haddad & Marx, 2018). Additionally, placement SAEs provide opportunities for students to gain practical insights into the financial aspects of agricultural operations, including understanding cash flow, inventory management, and financial reporting practices (Grigorian, 2023).
Types of Placement SAEs
Placement SAEs can be categorized into various types, including internships, cooperative education programs, and job shadowing experiences. These diverse opportunities allow students to gain practical experience in different sectors of the agricultural industry, such as production agriculture, agribusiness, and agricultural research (Smith & Rayfield, 2016). Each type of placement SAE presents unique financial management challenges and learning opportunities, requiring students to adapt their skills to specific workplace environments and industry practices (Doss et al., 2019).
Agribusiness placements
Agribusiness placements offer students valuable opportunities to gain hands-on experience in various aspects of agricultural business operations, including financial management, marketing, and supply chain logistics. These placements often involve working with established companies in sectors such as agricultural input suppliers, food processing firms, and agricultural technology providers, allowing students to develop practical skills and industry-specific knowledge (Saghaian et al., 2022).
Farm and ranch placements
Farm and ranch placements provide students with hands-on experience in various aspects of agricultural production, including crop and livestock management, equipment operation, and financial record-keeping. These placements often involve working on family-owned farms or large-scale commercial operations, allowing students to develop practical skills in sustainable farming practices, resource management, and agricultural technology implementation (Puente et al., 2023).
School-based enterprise placements
School-based enterprise placements provide students with hands-on experience in managing and operating small-scale agricultural businesses within the school environment. These placements often involve student-run greenhouses, livestock operations, or agricultural product sales, allowing participants to develop entrepreneurial skills alongside technical agricultural knowledge (Cooper et al., 2021). By engaging in school-based enterprises, students gain practical experience in financial management, marketing, and customer service within a controlled educational setting (Haddad & Marx, 2018).
Financial Planning for Placement SAEs
Effective financial planning is crucial for the success of placement SAEs, requiring students to develop comprehensive budgets that account for all potential expenses and income sources. This process involves careful consideration of factors such as transportation costs, equipment needs, and potential earnings, as well as an understanding of the financial policies and practices of the host organization (Haddad & Marx, 2018).
Setting financial goals
Setting financial goals is a critical step in the financial planning process for placement SAEs, requiring students to establish clear, measurable objectives for their experience (Haddad & Marx, 2018). These goals may include targets for earnings, skill development, or specific financial management competencies to be acquired during the placement (Aithal & Aithal, 2023).
Creating a budget
Creating a comprehensive budget for a placement SAE involves carefully estimating all potential expenses and income sources associated with the experience. Students should consider factors such as transportation costs, equipment needs, and potential earnings, while also accounting for any financial policies or practices specific to the host organization . This budgeting process not only helps in financial planning but also develops critical skills in cost analysis and resource allocation, which are essential for success in agricultural careers .
Identifying potential income sources
Students should also consider potential earnings from stipends, wages, or project-related income when identifying income sources for their placement SAEs. Additionally, they may explore opportunities for grants, scholarships, or sponsorships specifically designed to support agricultural education experiences (Younis et al., 2016).
Estimating expenses
Estimating expenses for a placement SAE requires a comprehensive analysis of all potential costs associated with the experience. Students should consider direct expenses such as transportation, equipment, and supplies, as well as indirect costs like potential lost income from other opportunities (Wu & Gao, 2024). Additionally, it is crucial to account for unexpected expenses and create a contingency fund to ensure financial stability throughout the placement period (Alabı et al., 2021).
Record Keeping and Financial Management
Effective record keeping is essential for the financial success of placement SAEs, requiring students to maintain detailed logs of all financial transactions, including income, expenses, and asset values. This practice not only aids in accurate financial reporting but also develops critical skills in data management and analysis, which are valuable for future careers in agriculture (Lamin et al., 2024).
Importance of accurate record keeping
Accurate record keeping is essential for evaluating the financial performance of placement SAEs and ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. Students engaged in placement SAEs must maintain detailed logs of all financial transactions, including income, expenses, and asset values, to facilitate comprehensive analysis and reporting (Wilson & Moore, 2007). This practice not only aids in financial management but also develops critical skills in data organization and analysis, which are valuable for future careers in agriculture and agribusiness (Aumjaud et al., 2023).
Tools and software for financial tracking
Various tools and software are available for financial tracking in placement SAEs, ranging from simple spreadsheet applications to specialized agricultural accounting software. These digital solutions enable students to efficiently record and analyze financial data, generate reports, and make informed decisions based on real-time information (Chudgar et al., 2022). The adoption of such digital tools not only enhances financial management practices but also prepares students for the increasingly technology-driven landscape of modern agriculture (Gilliss et al., 2024).
Analyzing financial data
Analyzing financial data in placement SAEs involves interpreting records to evaluate financial performance and make informed decisions. Students should develop skills in calculating key financial ratios, such as gross margin and return on investment, to assess the profitability and efficiency of their placement experiences (Lehenchuk et al., 2023).
Funding Sources for Placement SAEs
Funding sources for placement SAEs can include grants, scholarships, and sponsorships specifically designed to support agricultural education experiences . Additionally, some students may secure financial support through partnerships with local agribusinesses or agricultural organizations, which can provide both monetary assistance and valuable industry connections (Ushakov & Shatila, 2023).
Personal savings and family contributions
Personal savings and family contributions often serve as primary funding sources for placement SAEs, particularly for students from agricultural backgrounds. These financial resources can provide a stable foundation for students to initiate their placement experiences, allowing them to focus on skill development and learning opportunities rather than immediate financial concerns (Leong-on et al., 2023). However, the availability and extent of personal and family financial support can vary significantly among students, potentially creating disparities in access to high-quality placement opportunities (A & P, 2024).
Agricultural education program funds
Agricultural education program funds often provide crucial financial support for placement SAEs, enabling students to participate in high-quality learning experiences regardless of their personal financial circumstances. These funds may be allocated through state or federal initiatives, such as the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act, which aims to improve the quality of career and technical education programs across the United States (Amirnejad et al., 2018). Additionally, some agricultural education programs establish partnerships with local agribusinesses or industry organizations to secure additional funding and resources for student placements (Esau & Daniels, 2022).
Grants and scholarships
Grants and scholarships specifically designed for agricultural education experiences can provide substantial financial support for placement SAEs. These funding sources often come from agricultural organizations, industry associations, and government agencies dedicated to promoting agricultural education and workforce development (Curbelo, 2006). Additionally, some universities offer targeted scholarships and financial assistance programs to support students pursuing agricultural degrees and related experiential learning opportunities (Robotham & Windon, 2023).
Youth loans and microloans
Youth loans and microloans offer viable funding options for students pursuing placement SAEs, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds or rural communities. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Farm Service Agency provides youth loans specifically designed to support young farmers and ranchers in financing their agricultural projects, including SAEs (Goyal et al., 2017). These loan programs not only provide financial assistance but also offer valuable experience in financial management and loan repayment, preparing students for future agricultural entrepreneurship endeavors.
Managing Income and Expenses
Effective management of income and expenses is crucial for the financial success of placement SAEs, requiring students to develop skills in budgeting, cash flow management, and financial decision-making. Students must carefully track all sources of income, including wages, stipends, and project-related earnings, while also monitoring and controlling expenses such as transportation costs, equipment purchases, and supplies (Fernando & Arrieta, 2023).
Negotiating fair compensation
Negotiating fair compensation for placement SAEs requires students to research industry standards and develop effective communication skills. Students should consider factors such as the complexity of tasks, required skills, and the potential value they bring to the host organization when discussing compensation (Jiang, 2012).
Tracking and categorizing expenses
Effective tracking and categorization of expenses in placement SAEs requires students to develop systematic methods for recording and classifying financial transactions. Utilizing digital tools such as mobile applications or spreadsheet software can streamline this process, enabling real-time expense tracking and facilitating comprehensive financial analysis (Harsshita et al., 2024). These digital solutions not only enhance accuracy in record-keeping but also provide valuable experience in utilizing technology for financial management, a critical skill in modern agricultural operations .
Managing cash flow
Effective cash flow management in placement SAEs involves monitoring income and expenses to maintain financial stability throughout the experience. Students should develop strategies for balancing incoming funds with ongoing costs, such as transportation and supplies, while also setting aside reserves for unexpected expenses (Goyal et al., 2017). Utilizing digital tools and software for financial tracking can enhance students' ability to analyze cash flow patterns and make informed decisions about resource allocation (Manaf et al., 2022).
Tax Considerations for Placement SAEs
Tax considerations for placement SAEs involve understanding the potential tax implications of income earned during the experience. Students should familiarize themselves with relevant tax regulations, including those related to self-employment income and potential deductions for educational expenses (Liu et al., 2024). Additionally, maintaining accurate financial records throughout the placement is crucial for proper tax reporting and compliance with local and federal tax laws (Aleskerova & Fedoryshynа, 2023).
Understanding tax obligations
Understanding tax obligations for placement SAEs requires students to familiarize themselves with relevant tax regulations, including those related to self-employment income and potential deductions for educational expenses . Students must also consider the potential impact of their placement income on personal tax liabilities and explore strategies for optimizing their tax position within legal boundaries (Chandra & Hidayah, 2023).
Keeping records for tax purposes
Maintaining accurate records for tax purposes is essential for students engaged in placement SAEs, as it facilitates proper reporting and compliance with tax regulations (Wilson & Moore, 2007). These records should include detailed documentation of income, expenses, and any relevant financial transactions related to the placement experience (Goyal et al., 2017).
Potential tax deductions and credits
Students engaged in placement SAEs may be eligible for various tax deductions and credits related to their educational and work-related expenses. These can include deductions for work-related travel, equipment purchases, and educational materials directly related to their placement experience (Maizels & Foster, 2019). Additionally, some jurisdictions offer specific tax credits or incentives to encourage participation in agricultural education and workforce development programs, which can provide significant financial benefits to students pursuing placement SAEs (Aleskerova & Fedoryshynа, 2023).
Risk Management in Placement SAEs
Effective risk management in placement SAEs involves identifying potential hazards, implementing preventive measures, and developing contingency plans to mitigate financial losses. Students should conduct thorough risk assessments, considering factors such as workplace safety, liability issues, and potential market fluctuations that could impact their placement experience (Yang et al., 2022).
Identifying potential financial risks
Identifying potential financial risks in placement SAEs requires a comprehensive analysis of both internal and external factors that could impact the financial stability of the experience. Students should consider risks such as market fluctuations, changes in agricultural policies, and unexpected expenses related to equipment or supplies (Goyal et al., 2017). Additionally, it is crucial to assess potential liability issues and workplace safety concerns that could result in financial losses or legal complications .
Insurance options for placement SAEs
Insurance options for placement SAEs may include liability coverage, property insurance, and workers' compensation, depending on the specific nature of the placement and the host organization's policies (Haddad & Marx, 2018). Students should consult with their agricultural education instructors and host organizations to determine appropriate insurance coverage and ensure compliance with local regulations (Goyal et al., 2017).
Developing contingency plans
Developing contingency plans for placement SAEs involves identifying potential risks and creating strategies to mitigate their impact on the financial stability of the experience. Students should consider scenarios such as equipment failures, market fluctuations, or unexpected changes in host organization policies, and develop action plans to address these challenges (Goyal et al., 2017). Additionally, establishing emergency funds and maintaining open communication channels with supervisors and mentors can enhance students' ability to navigate unforeseen financial obstacles during their placement experiences (Robotham & Windon, 2023).
Evaluating Financial Performance
Evaluating financial performance in placement SAEs involves analyzing key metrics such as return on investment, gross margin, and cost-benefit ratios to assess the overall financial success of the experience. Students should utilize financial analysis tools and software to calculate these metrics and compare them against industry benchmarks, enabling data-driven decision-making and continuous improvement of their financial management practices (Goyal et al., 2017).
Calculating profitability
Calculating profitability in placement SAEs involves analyzing key financial metrics such as gross margin, return on investment, and cost-benefit ratios. Students should utilize financial analysis tools to compute these indicators and compare them against industry benchmarks, enabling data-driven evaluation of their placement experiences (Goyal et al., 2017). Additionally, incorporating sensitivity analysis techniques can help students assess the impact of various factors on profitability and develop strategies to optimize financial performance (Obiekwe et al., 2024).
Assessing return on investment
Assessing return on investment (ROI) for placement SAEs involves calculating the financial benefits derived from the experience relative to the costs incurred. A study of extended rural placements for medical students in Australia found an ROI of $7.60 for every dollar spent, considering both student benefits and rural workforce impacts (Woolley et al., 2021). This approach can be adapted to evaluate the financial performance of agricultural placement SAEs, taking into account factors such as skill development, career opportunities, and contributions to rural agricultural communities.
Identifying areas for improvement
To identify areas for improvement in placement SAEs, students should conduct thorough analyses of their financial performance, comparing key metrics against industry benchmarks and their initial goals (Goyal et al., 2017). This process may involve evaluating factors such as cost efficiency, productivity gains, and the effectiveness of risk management strategies implemented during the placement experience (Liu et al., 2024).
Long-term Financial Planning
Long-term financial planning for placement SAEs involves developing strategies to leverage the skills and experiences gained during the placement for future career advancement and financial stability. Students should consider how their placement experiences align with their long-term career goals in agriculture and agribusiness, and identify opportunities for continued professional development and networking . Additionally, they should explore potential pathways for transitioning from placement experiences to full-time employment or entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector, taking into account factors such as market trends, technological advancements, and evolving industry practices (Goyal et al., 2017).
Reinvesting profits
Reinvesting profits from placement SAEs can provide students with opportunities to expand their agricultural operations and explore new ventures within the industry. This practice not only enhances financial management skills but also fosters entrepreneurial mindsets, preparing students for future careers in agribusiness (Kwapong et al., 2020).
Saving for future educational and career goals
Saving for future educational and career goals is a critical aspect of long-term financial planning for students engaged in placement SAEs. Research has shown that students who actively save during their placement experiences are more likely to pursue advanced degrees and secure higher-paying positions in the agricultural sector (Thompson, 2022). To maximize the benefits of their placement experiences, students should develop comprehensive savings strategies that align with their specific career aspirations and potential graduate education requirements.
Building credit and financial responsibility
Building credit and financial responsibility during placement SAEs can provide students with valuable experience in managing financial obligations and establishing a positive credit history. This process may involve responsible use of credit cards, timely repayment of youth loans, and maintaining accurate financial records (Goyal et al., 2017). Additionally, students can benefit from developing skills in negotiating fair compensation and understanding tax obligations related to their placement experiences (Honoré et al., 2020).
Conclusion
Effective long-term financial planning for placement SAEs requires students to develop a comprehensive strategy that aligns their experiences with future career goals in agriculture and agribusiness. This approach should incorporate ongoing professional development, networking opportunities, and an understanding of emerging market trends and technological advancements in the agricultural sector (Goyal et al., 2017). Additionally, students should consider how their placement experiences can contribute to building a strong financial foundation for future educational pursuits, such as advanced degrees in agricultural sciences or related fields .
Key takeaways for financial success in placement SAEs
Key takeaways for financial success in placement SAEs include developing comprehensive budgeting skills, maintaining accurate financial records, and implementing effective risk management strategies. Additionally, students should focus on building professional networks and seeking mentorship opportunities within their placement organizations to enhance their long-term career prospects in the agricultural sector (Haddad & Marx, 2018).
The impact of financial management skills on future careers in agriculture
The development of strong financial management skills through placement SAEs can significantly enhance students' future career prospects in the agricultural sector. Research has shown that individuals with practical experience in financial planning and analysis are more likely to secure leadership positions and contribute to innovative agricultural practices (Blackburn & Ramsey, 2014). Furthermore, these skills enable graduates to navigate the complex financial landscapes of modern agribusinesses, including risk management, investment analysis, and strategic financial decision-making (Uspambayeva et al., 2020).
References
Bastian, K. C., Patterson, K. M., & Carpenter, D. (2020). Placed for Success: Which Teachers Benefit from High-Quality Student Teaching Placements? Educational Policy, 36, 1583–1611.
Barrick, R. K., Roberts, T., Samy, M., Thoron, A., & Easterly, R. G. (2011). A Needs Assessment to Determine Knowledge and Ability of Egyptian Agricultural Technical School Teachers Related to Supervised Agricultural Experience. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52, 1–11.
Haddad, B., & Marx, A. (2018). Student Perceptions of Soft Skills & Career Decision Self-Efficacy through Participation in SAE. Journal of Agricultural Education.
Grigorian, R. (2023). Peculiarities of the manifestation of risks in the activity of agricultural enterprises in modern of conditions. Ekonomìka Ta Upravlìnnâ APK.
Smith, K. L., & Rayfield, J. (2016). An Early Historical Examination of the Educational Intent of Supervised Agricultural Experiences (SAEs) and Project-Based Learning in Agricultural Education. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57, 146–160.
Doss, W., Rayfield, J., Murphy, T. H., & Frost, K. J. (2019). Examining agricultural mechanics projects and their use as supervised agricultural experiences. Journal of Agricultural Education.
Saghaian, S., Mohammadi, H., & Mohammadi, M. (2022). Factors Affecting Success of Entrepreneurship in Agribusinesses: Evidence from the City of Mashhad, Iran. Sustainability.
Puente, M., Martinez, M. N., Arroyo, D. R., & Torres, S. (2023). Rural Latinx Students’ Spatial Imaginations of Their College Choices: Toward a Student Understanding of “Rural-Serving Institutions” in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Education Sciences.
Cooper, M., Jegatheesan, M., Sornalingam, S., & Fernandes, C. (2021). Student self-arranged placements: a solution for expanding and enhancing undergraduate experience in general practice? Education for Primary Care, 32, 370–371.
Aithal, S., & Aithal, S. (2023). Incubationship – A Systematic Analysis of Recently Announced Super Innovation in Higher Education using SWOC, ABCD, and PESTL Frameworks. International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education.
Younis, S., Nasr, G., & Esseid, M. M. A. (2016). TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT POWER RATING OF AGRICULTURAL TRACTORS IN LIBYA.
Wu, T., & Gao, M. (2024). Agricultural payment mechanisms, medical cost anxiety, and incomemobility in China. African Journal of Reproductive Health.
Alabı, O., Oladele, A., & Usman, M. (2021). DETERMINANTS OF AGRICULTURAL LOAN DECISION MAKING PROCESS FOR RICE (ORYZA SATIVA) FARMERS IN ABUJA, NIGERIA. APPLICATIONS OF HECKMAN TWO-STAGE MODEL AND FACTOR ANALYSIS. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 59.
Lamin, N. Z., Jusoh, W. N. A. W., Zainudin, A. J. M., Samad, N. H. A., & Badari, K. A. (2024). Optimizing Internship Placement Process: A Study on the Implementation of an Internship Placement Management System (IPMS) at Universiti Poly-Tech Malaysia to Improve Efficiency and Student Experience. International Journal of Religion.
Wilson, E., & Moore, G. (2007). EXPLORING THE PARADOX OF SUPERVISED AGRICULTURAL EXPERIENCE PROGRAMS IN AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48, 82–92.
Aumjaud, B., Ramasawmy, B., Driver, B. M. F., & Ramful‐Baboolall, D. (2023). Higher education student work placement and employability. 9th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’23).
Chudgar, P. D., Burkule, N., Kamat, N., Rege, G. M., & Jantre, M. N. (2022). Myocardial Strain Imaging Using Feature Tracking Method of Cardiac MRI: Our Initial Experience of This Novel Parameter as an Additional Diagnostic Tool. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging, 32, 479–487.
Gilliss, L., Madevu-Matson, C., Boyle, C., Kunaka, D., Kouyate, M., Kebe, R., Sewradj, V., & Watson-Grant, S. (2024). How Do Countries Select and Use Digital Global Goods in Emergency Settings? Lessons Learned from the DHIS2 COVID-19 Data Management Experiences in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Suriname. Oxford Open Digital Health.
Lehenchuk, S., Chyzhevska, L., Meluchová, J., Zdyrko, N., & Voskalo, V. (2023). Determinants of agricultural companies’ financial performance: The experience of Poland, Slovakia and Ukraine. Investment Management & Financial Innovations.
Ushakov, D., & Shatila, K. (2023). Different financial methods to finance agricultural small-medium enterprises: the case of Indonesia. E3S Web of Conferences.
Leong-on, R. M. G., Hernandez, C. N., Libo-on, R. M., Gumban, G. G., Tabar, M. J. P., Parreño, A. A., & Aller, R. B. (2023). Lived Experiences in Family Business Among Business Graduates of a Private Higher Educational Institution in Iloilo City, Philippines. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research.
A, Mr. A. T., & P, Prof. I. (2024). PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES (PACS) AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGS): A STUDY IN KARNATAKA, INDIA. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies.
Amirnejad, H., Mazrae, F., & Tajanki, R. Z. (2018). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Financial Success of Agricultural Enterprises (Case Study of Agricultural Cooperatives in selected cities). Journal of Entrepreneurial Strategies in Agriculture.
Esau, J., & Daniels, D. (2022). From out-of-school-youth to TVET student: Exploring the funds in families and communities that facilitate second-chance learning. Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training.
Curbelo, A. (2006). The impact of the secondary agricultural education program on Latino students: perspectives towards the agricultural education class, the local FFA organization and the supervised agricultural experiences program in Iowa public schools.
Robotham, D., & Windon, S. (2023). Student Pre-University Experiences Toward Commitment to Agriculture. NACTA Journal.
Goyal, M., Panigrahi, B., & Panda, S. (2017). Micro Irrigation Scheduling and Practices.
Fernando, G. C., & Arrieta, G. S. (2023). Income, Expenses and Expenditure Patterns of Elementary Public-School Teachers: Inputs to a Proposed Financial Literacy Program. International Journal of Social Learning (IJSL).
Jiang, F. (2012). Essays in empirical corporate finance: CEO compensation, social interactions, and M&A.
Harsshita, S., Shruthi, A., Srinidhi, B. K., & Sandhya, Dr. A. (2024). Advanced Personal Budget Analytics: Combining Optical Character Recognition and Natural Language Processing for Automated Budget Categorization and Insight Extraction. International Research Journal on Advanced Engineering Hub (IRJAEH).
Manaf, S. M. A., Ismail, F., Azmin, N. A. M., Abdullah, S., Hamzah, S. F. M., Azlan, N. N. A., Affandi, S., & Mohamed, Z. (2022). MoneyWise Cash-Flow Simulation Module: Improving Students’ Grade Through Enhanced Personal Financial Planning System. E-Jurnal Penyelidikan Dan Inovasi.
Liu, Y., Cui, J., Feng, L., & Yan, H. (2024). Does county financial marketization promote high-quality development of agricultural economy?: Analysis of the mechanism of county urbanization. PLoS ONE, 19.
Aleskerova, Y., & Fedoryshynа, L. (2023). FINANCIAL MECHANISM IN THE SYSTEM OF ECONOMIC VECTORS OF DEVELOPMENT OF HOTEL AND RESTAURANT AND AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies.
Chandra, D., & Hidayah, N. (2023). The Influence of Taxpayer Awareness, Tax Service Quality, and Tax Sanctions on Taxpayer Compliance Level with Taxpayer Financial Condition as a Moderating Variable. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research.
Maizels, M., & Foster, W. (2019). The Gallerist’s Gambit: Financial Innovation, Tax Law, and the Making of the Contemporary Art Market. Social Science Research Network.
Yang, J., Tang, D., Kong, H., & Boamah, V. (2022). Research on financial risk management and control of agricultural products supply chain—A case study of Jiangsu Province of China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10.
Obiekwe, N. J., Okeke, U., Njideka, C., & Ozor, M. (2024). Profitability and Determinants of Output of Rice Production in Anambra State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Agricultural Research.
Woolley, T., Gupta, T. S. S., Stewart, R., & Hollins, A. (2021). A return-on-investment analysis of impacts on James Cook University medical students and rural workforce resulting from participation in extended rural placements. Rural and Remote Health, 21 4, 6597.
Kwapong, N., Ankrah, D., Boateng-Gyambiby, D., Asenso-Agyemang, J., & Fening, L. O. (2020). Assessment of Agricultural Advisory Messages from Farmer-to-Farmer in Making a Case for Scaling Up Production: A Qualitative Study. The Qualitative Report, 25, 2011–2025.
Thompson, S. (2022). ADVANCING DIVERSITY IN ADRD/AGING RESEARCH AND CLINICAL CARE: EDUCATIONAL AND CAREER TRAJECTORIES OF MSTEM MENTEES. Innovation in Aging, 6, 857–857.
Honoré, M., Keller, T., Lindwall, J., Crist, R., Bienen, L., & Zell, A. (2020). Contributions Made by Undergraduates to Research Projects: Using the CREDIT Taxonomy to Assess Undergraduate Research Experiences. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 4 1, 41–51.
Blackburn, J., & Ramsey, J. W. (2014). Barriers to Conducting Supervised Agricultural Experiences as Perceived by Preservice Education Teachers. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension.
Uspambayeva, M., Zeinelgabdin, A., Turebekova, B., Rakayeva, A., Tulaganov, A., & Taipov, T. (2020). Agriculture in Kazakhstan: effective financial management. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy.