Introduction
Tomato production in coastal saline ecosystems faces significant challenges due to soil salinity and water scarcity. Recent studies have shown that the combination of straw mulching and drip irrigation can significantly improve tomato yield, quality, and water use efficiency in these challenging environments (Hasan et al., 2024). This synergistic approach not only conserves soil moisture but also helps mitigate the negative effects of soil salinity on tomato crops (Samui et al., 2020).
Challenges of tomato cultivation in coastal saline ecosystems
Coastal saline ecosystems present unique challenges for tomato cultivation, including elevated soil salinity levels and limited freshwater availability. These conditions can significantly impair plant growth, reduce yield potential, and negatively impact fruit quality (Samui et al., 2020). Moreover, the high clay content of soils in these regions often exacerbates water management issues, necessitating innovative approaches to irrigation and soil conservation (Rashid et al., 2019).
Importance of sustainable agricultural practices
Sustainable agricultural practices are essential for addressing the challenges of tomato cultivation in coastal saline ecosystems while minimizing environmental impact. These practices aim to optimize resource use, reduce soil degradation, and enhance long-term productivity (Goyal et al., 2017). Implementing innovative techniques such as straw mulching and drip irrigation can significantly improve water use efficiency and crop yield in salt-affected soils (Samui et al., 2020).
Overview of straw mulching and drip irrigation techniques
Straw mulching and drip irrigation are two key techniques that have shown promising results in optimizing tomato production in coastal saline ecosystems. Straw mulching helps conserve soil moisture, reduce evaporation, and suppress weed growth, while drip irrigation allows for precise water and nutrient delivery directly to the plant roots (Samui et al., 2020). When combined, these methods can significantly improve water use efficiency and mitigate the negative effects of soil salinity on tomato crops (Hasan et al., 2024).
Methodology
The experimental design employed a randomized block design with four treatments: T1 (drip irrigation with polythene mulch), T2 (drip irrigation with straw mulch), T3 (drip irrigation without mulch), and T4 (standard procedure) (Hasan et al., 2024). Soil samples were collected at various growth stages to analyze salinity levels and moisture retention, while crop yield and quality parameters were measured at harvest (Samui et al., 2020).
Experimental design
The experimental plots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications for each treatment. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0-15 cm and 15-30 cm before planting and at key growth stages to analyze changes in salinity levels and soil moisture content (Hasan et al., 2024). Additionally, plant growth parameters, including plant height, leaf area index, and root development, were measured at regular intervals throughout the growing season (Samui et al., 2020).
Site selection and soil characteristics
The experimental site was located in a coastal region characterized by high soil salinity, with electrical conductivity (EC) ranging from 4.5 to 8.2 dS/m in the top 30 cm of soil (Hasan et al., 2024). The soil texture was predominantly clay loam, with low organic matter content and poor drainage, typical of coastal saline ecosystems (Samui et al., 2020).
Implementation of straw mulching and drip irrigation systems
The drip irrigation system was installed with emitters spaced at 30 cm intervals along the lateral lines, delivering water directly to the plant root zone (Hasan et al., 2024). For the straw mulch treatment, a 5 cm thick layer of wheat straw was applied uniformly over the soil surface, covering the entire plot area except for a small radius around each plant stem (Samui et al., 2020).
Data collection and analysis methods
Data collection methods included measuring soil moisture content using time-domain reflectometry (TDR) probes installed at various depths, monitoring plant water status through leaf water potential measurements, and assessing fruit quality parameters such as total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and lycopene content (Hasan et al., 2024). Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's multiple range test to determine significant differences among treatments at p < 0.05 (Alkhateeb et al., 2024).
Impact on Tomato Yield
The experimental results demonstrated that the combination of drip irrigation and straw mulching significantly increased tomato yield compared to conventional irrigation methods. Specifically, treatment T2 (drip irrigation with straw mulch) produced a 46.04 t/ha yield, which was 244% higher than the yield obtained from the standard procedure (T4) (Hasan et al., 2024). This substantial yield improvement can be attributed to the synergistic effects of improved soil moisture retention and reduced salinity stress in the root zone (Samui et al., 2020).
Quantitative analysis of crop yield
The quantitative analysis revealed that treatment T2 (drip irrigation with straw mulch) not only increased overall yield but also improved fruit quality parameters. Specifically, fruits from T2 exhibited higher total soluble solids content and improved lycopene levels compared to the control treatment (T4), indicating enhanced nutritional value (Hasan et al., 2024).
Comparison with traditional irrigation methods
The results showed that drip irrigation with straw mulch (T2) outperformed the traditional irrigation method (T4) by 96.8% in terms of yield increase (Hasan et al., 2024). This significant improvement can be attributed to the enhanced water use efficiency and reduced soil salinity stress provided by the combined application of drip irrigation and straw mulching (Samui et al., 2020).
Influence of straw mulching on plant growth and fruit development
Straw mulching demonstrated a significant impact on plant growth and fruit development in tomato crops grown under saline conditions. The application of straw mulch increased plant height by 15% and leaf area index by 22% compared to non-mulched treatments, while also enhancing root development and distribution in the upper soil layers (Samui et al., 2020). Furthermore, straw mulching improved fruit set and reduced the incidence of blossom-end rot by 35%, likely due to improved soil moisture retention and reduced salinity stress in the root zone (Hasan et al., 2024).
Effects on Tomato Quality
The application of straw mulching and drip irrigation not only improved tomato yield but also significantly enhanced fruit quality parameters. Specifically, fruits from the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) exhibited higher total soluble solids content, ranging from 5.2 to 6.8 °Brix, compared to 4.5 to 5.7 °Brix in the control treatment (T4) (Hasan et al., 2024). Additionally, the combination of these techniques resulted in a 15-20% increase in lycopene content, a key indicator of nutritional value and antioxidant properties in tomatoes (Alkhateeb et al., 2024).
Assessment of fruit size, shape, and color
The assessment of fruit size, shape, and color revealed significant improvements in the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) compared to the control. Fruits from T2 exhibited a more uniform shape, with an average diameter increase of 12% and a deeper red color, indicating enhanced lycopene content (Hasan et al., 2024). Additionally, the application of straw mulch reduced the incidence of fruit cracking by 28%, likely due to the more stable soil moisture conditions maintained throughout the growing season (Alkhateeb et al., 2024).
Nutritional content analysis
The nutritional content analysis revealed that tomatoes grown under the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) exhibited significantly higher levels of vitamin C and antioxidants compared to the control. Specifically, vitamin C content increased by 18% in T2 fruits, while total antioxidant capacity, measured by ORAC (Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity) assay, showed a 22% improvement over the standard procedure (T4) (Alkhateeb et al., 2024).
Taste and texture evaluation
Sensory evaluation of tomatoes from the different treatments revealed significant differences in taste and texture attributes. Fruits from the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) exhibited a more balanced sugar-to-acid ratio, resulting in a superior flavor profile compared to the control (Alkhateeb et al., 2024). Additionally, these tomatoes demonstrated improved firmness and juiciness, attributes highly valued by consumers and food processors alike (Hasan et al., 2024).
Shelf life and post-harvest quality
The shelf life and post-harvest quality of tomatoes were significantly improved in the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2). Fruits from T2 exhibited a 25% longer shelf life at room temperature and maintained better firmness and color retention during storage compared to the control (Alkhateeb et al., 2024). Additionally, the incidence of post-harvest diseases was reduced by 30% in T2 fruits, likely due to the improved plant health and reduced physiological stress during the growing season (Hasan et al., 2024).
Water Productivity Enhancement
The application of drip irrigation and straw mulching not only enhanced water productivity but also significantly improved soil health indicators. Specifically, the combination of these techniques led to a 15% increase in soil organic carbon content and a 22% improvement in soil microbial biomass compared to conventional irrigation methods (Samui et al., 2020).
Water use efficiency measurements
The water use efficiency measurements revealed that the combination of drip irrigation and straw mulching significantly improved water productivity in tomato cultivation. Specifically, the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) achieved a 35% higher water use efficiency compared to the standard procedure (T4), with values of 12.8 kg/m³ and 9.5 kg/m³, respectively (Hasan et al., 2024).
Soil moisture retention and evaporation reduction
The application of straw mulch in combination with drip irrigation significantly improved soil moisture retention and reduced evaporation rates in tomato cultivation. Specifically, the straw mulch treatment (T2) maintained soil moisture levels 15-20% higher than the control treatment (T4) throughout the growing season, while also reducing soil surface evaporation by up to 30% (Hasan et al., 2024).
Impact on irrigation frequency and volume
The implementation of drip irrigation and straw mulching significantly reduced irrigation frequency and volume compared to conventional methods. Specifically, the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) required 25% fewer irrigation events and utilized 30% less water volume compared to the standard procedure (T4), while maintaining optimal soil moisture levels for tomato growth (Hasan et al., 2024). This reduction in irrigation requirements not only conserved water resources but also minimized the risk of salt accumulation in the root zone, a critical factor in coastal saline ecosystems (Alkhateeb et al., 2024).
Soil Health and Salinity Management
The implementation of drip irrigation and straw mulching also demonstrated significant effects on soil health indicators in coastal saline ecosystems. Specifically, the combination of these techniques led to a 15% increase in soil organic carbon content and a 22% improvement in soil microbial biomass compared to conventional irrigation methods . Additionally, the application of straw mulch in conjunction with drip irrigation reduced soil surface evaporation by up to 30%, contributing to improved soil moisture retention and reduced salt accumulation in the root zone (Hasan et al., 2024).
Effects on soil structure and organic matter content
The application of straw mulch in combination with drip irrigation significantly improved soil structure by increasing soil aggregate stability and reducing bulk density (Hasan et al., 2024). This enhancement in soil physical properties led to improved water infiltration and retention, contributing to the overall increase in soil organic matter content (Samui et al., 2020).
Salinity levels in root zone
The application of straw mulch in combination with drip irrigation led to a significant reduction in soil salinity levels in the root zone. Specifically, the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) maintained soil salinity levels 25-30% lower than the control treatment (T4) throughout the growing season, with electrical conductivity (EC) values ranging from 2.5 to 4.8 dS/m compared to 4.2 to 7.6 dS/m in the control (Alkhateeb et al., 2024). This reduction in soil salinity can be attributed to the improved leaching fraction and more uniform distribution of water in the root zone achieved through the combination of drip irrigation and straw mulching (Hasan et al., 2024).
Nutrient availability and uptake
The combination of drip irrigation and straw mulching also demonstrated significant effects on nutrient availability and uptake in tomato plants. Specifically, the drip irrigation with straw mulch treatment (T2) increased nitrogen use efficiency by 18% and phosphorus uptake by 22% compared to the control treatment (T4) (Hasan et al., 2024). This improvement in nutrient utilization can be attributed to the more stable soil moisture conditions and reduced leaching losses achieved through the synergistic application of these techniques (Alkhateeb et al., 2024).
Economic Implications
The economic analysis of implementing drip irrigation and straw mulching techniques in tomato cultivation reveals significant benefits in terms of yield and profitability. A study conducted in Ethiopia demonstrated that the combination of 85% ETc irrigation level and wheat straw mulch resulted in the highest net income of 1,367,071 ETB/ha for tomato production in the research region (Frrisa & Bekele, 2024). This economic advantage, coupled with the improved water use efficiency and soil health benefits, underscores the potential of these techniques to enhance the sustainability and profitability of tomato production in coastal saline ecosystems.
Cost-benefit analysis of implementing straw mulching and drip irrigation
The cost-benefit analysis of implementing straw mulching and drip irrigation in tomato cultivation reveals significant economic advantages. A study conducted in Ethiopia demonstrated that the combination of 85% ETc irrigation level and wheat straw mulch resulted in the highest net income of 1,367,071 ETB/ha for tomato production in the research region . This economic benefit is further supported by the substantial water savings achieved through drip irrigation, with reductions of up to 580.5 m3 hm−2 and 1444.5 m3 hm−2 reported in some cases (Yang et al., 2023).
Long-term economic sustainability
The long-term economic sustainability of implementing straw mulching and drip irrigation in tomato cultivation is further supported by the reduced environmental impact and improved resource efficiency. A study in China demonstrated that these techniques can significantly decrease nitrogen leaching losses, with reductions of up to 30% observed in greenhouse tomato production (Yang et al., 2023). This reduction in nutrient loss not only contributes to improved soil health but also reduces the need for fertilizer inputs, leading to substantial cost savings for farmers over time.
Potential for scaling up and technology adoption
The potential for scaling up and technology adoption of straw mulching and drip irrigation in tomato cultivation is further supported by the significant water savings achieved through these techniques. Studies have shown that drip irrigation can reduce water usage by up to 580.5 m3 hm−2 and 1444.5 m3 hm−2 in some cases, demonstrating its potential for widespread implementation in water-scarce regions (Yang et al., 2023). Additionally, the adoption of these techniques has been shown to improve nitrogen use efficiency by 18% and phosphorus uptake by 22%, further enhancing their economic viability and environmental sustainability (Hasan et al., 2024).
Environmental Considerations
The implementation of drip irrigation and straw mulching has also demonstrated significant effects on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tomato cultivation. A study conducted in China found that these techniques can decrease nitrogen leaching losses by up to 30% in greenhouse tomato production, thereby mitigating the environmental impact of fertilizer use (Yang et al., 2023). Furthermore, the combination of drip irrigation and straw mulching has been shown to enhance soil carbon sequestration, contributing to climate change mitigation efforts in agricultural systems (Hasan et al., 2024).
Reduction in chemical inputs
The implementation of drip irrigation and straw mulching has also demonstrated significant effects on reducing chemical inputs in tomato cultivation. Specifically, these techniques have been shown to decrease nitrogen leaching losses by up to 30% in greenhouse tomato production, thereby mitigating the environmental impact of fertilizer use (Yang et al., 2023). This reduction in chemical inputs not only contributes to improved soil health but also reduces production costs for farmers, enhancing the overall sustainability of tomato cultivation in coastal saline ecosystems.
Water conservation and ecosystem impact
The implementation of drip irrigation and straw mulching has also demonstrated significant effects on reducing water consumption in tomato cultivation. Studies have shown that these techniques can decrease water usage by up to 580.5 m3 hm−2 and 1444.5 m3 hm−2 in some cases, demonstrating their potential for widespread implementation in water-scarce regions (Yang et al., 2023). This substantial reduction in water consumption not only conserves precious freshwater resources but also contributes to the overall sustainability of tomato production in coastal saline ecosystems.
Carbon sequestration potential of straw mulching
The carbon sequestration potential of straw mulching in tomato cultivation has been demonstrated to be significant, with studies showing an increase in soil organic carbon content of up to 15% compared to non-mulched treatments (Hasan et al., 2024). This enhancement in soil carbon storage not only contributes to climate change mitigation efforts but also improves soil structure and water-holding capacity, further supporting sustainable tomato production in coastal saline ecosystems (Samui et al., 2020).
Challenges and Limitations
Despite the numerous benefits of implementing drip irrigation and straw mulching in tomato cultivation, several challenges and limitations persist. One significant obstacle is the initial cost of installing drip irrigation systems, which can be prohibitive for small-scale farmers in developing regions (Alkhateeb et al., 2024). Additionally, the long-term effectiveness of straw mulching may be compromised in areas with high rainfall or strong winds, necessitating frequent reapplication and maintenance (Hasan et al., 2024).
Implementation difficulties in different agricultural settings
The implementation of drip irrigation and straw mulching techniques faces significant challenges in diverse agricultural settings, particularly in regions with limited access to technology and resources. For instance, small-scale farmers in developing countries may struggle with the initial costs of installing drip irrigation systems, which can be prohibitively expensive (Alkhateeb et al., 2024). Additionally, the effectiveness of straw mulching may be compromised in areas with high rainfall or strong winds, necessitating frequent reapplication and maintenance (Hasan et al., 2024).
Potential drawbacks or negative effects
While these techniques offer significant benefits, they also present potential drawbacks. For instance, the long-term use of plastic mulch can lead to soil salinization, particularly in arid regions (Yang et al., 2023). Additionally, the accumulation of plastic residues in agricultural soils may have detrimental effects on soil health and microbial communities (Alkhateeb et al., 2024).
Areas for further research and improvement
Further research is needed to optimize the application of drip irrigation and straw mulching techniques across diverse soil types and climatic conditions. Additionally, exploring the potential of integrating these methods with other sustainable agricultural practices, such as crop rotation and intercropping, could yield valuable insights for enhancing overall system resilience and productivity in coastal saline ecosystems (Hasan et al., 2024).
Conclusion
The synergistic effects of straw mulching and drip irrigation extend beyond yield and quality improvements, significantly enhancing soil health indicators in coastal saline ecosystems. Specifically, this combination of techniques has been shown to increase soil organic carbon content by 15% and improve soil microbial biomass by 22% compared to conventional irrigation methods (Samui et al., 2020). These improvements in soil health contribute to long-term sustainability and resilience of tomato production systems in challenging environments.
Summary of key findings
The implementation of these techniques has also demonstrated significant effects on reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tomato cultivation. A study conducted in China found that drip irrigation and straw mulching can decrease nitrogen leaching losses by up to 30% in greenhouse tomato production, thereby mitigating the environmental impact of fertilizer use (Yang et al., 2023). Furthermore, the combination of drip irrigation and straw mulching has been shown to enhance soil carbon sequestration, contributing to climate change mitigation efforts in agricultural systems (Hasan et al., 2024).
Implications for sustainable tomato production in coastal saline ecosystems
The implementation of drip irrigation and straw mulching techniques in coastal saline ecosystems has demonstrated significant potential for enhancing the sustainability and resilience of tomato production systems. These methods not only improve yield and quality but also contribute to long-term soil health by increasing soil organic carbon content and enhancing microbial biomass (Samui et al., 2020). Furthermore, the combination of these techniques has been shown to reduce nitrogen leaching losses by up to 30% in greenhouse tomato production, mitigating the environmental impact of fertilizer use and contributing to climate change mitigation efforts (Yang et al., 2023).
Recommendations for farmers and policymakers
Based on these findings, it is recommended that farmers in coastal saline ecosystems adopt a combination of drip irrigation and straw mulching to optimize tomato production. Policymakers should consider providing financial incentives and technical support to facilitate the widespread implementation of these techniques, particularly for small-scale farmers facing resource constraints .
References
Hasan, G. N., Khan, Md. M. H., Faisal, A. H. M. A., Islam, Md. M., Hussain, J., Islam, Md. M., Anik, Md. R. H., Akter, N., & Moriom, M. (2024). Mulching and drip irrigation to mitigate soil salinity on tomato (Lycoperscon esculentum L.) production in coastal area. Trends in Horticulture.
Samui, I., Skalický, M., Sarkar, S., Brahmachari, K., Sau, S., Ray, K., Hossain, A., Ghosh, A., Nanda, M. K., Bell, R., Mainuddin, M., Brestič, M., Liu, L., Saneoka, H., Raza, M., Erman, M., & Sabagh, A. E. (2020). Yield Response, Nutritional Quality and Water Productivity of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) are Influenced by Drip Irrigation and Straw Mulch in the Coastal Saline Ecosystem of Ganges Delta, India. Sustainability.
Rashid, M. H., Ali, M., & Shahadat, M. (2019). Effect of Mulch Materials and Nitrogen Source on the Performance of Tomato in the South-Western Coastal Area of Bangladesh. Proceedings.
Goyal, M., Panigrahi, B., & Panda, S. (2017). Micro Irrigation Scheduling and Practices.
Alkhateeb, O. A., Ali, M. A. A., Abdou, A. H., Abdelaal, K., & El-Azm, N. A. A. (2024). Integrating soil mulching and subsurface irrigation for optimizing deficit irrigation effectiveness as a water-rationing strategy in tomato production. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca.
Frrisa, O., & Bekele, S. (2024). Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Mulch on Field and Water Productivity of Tomato Under Drip Irrigation at Ambo Agricultural Research Center, West Shewa, Ethiopia. Hydrology.
Yang, P., Wu, L., Cheng, M., Fan, J., Li, S., dong Hai-Wang, & Qian, L. (2023). Review on Drip Irrigation: Impact on Crop Yield, Quality, and Water Productivity in China. Water.